iOS Code Review Checklist for Security & Performance

The App Store is not a forgiving place. In 2024 alone, Apple reviewed 7.77 million app submissions and rejected nearly 1.93 million, roughly one in four. Performance issues, privacy violations, and design inconsistencies were the top reasons apps got turned away, and many of those problems would have been caught in a good code review before the submission was ever made.

According to Business of Apps, consumer spending on iOS reached $117.6 billion in 2025 and iOS users spend nearly twice as much per app as Android users. That kind of ecosystem rewards apps built to a high standard, and penalizes ones that cut corners on quality or security.

A structured code review is one of the most direct investments an iOS team can make before launch or before a funding round. It’s also a must if you plan on handing your codebase to a new development partner. It is the step that turns a working app into one that stays working.

Today, we’ll share a checklist with you that captures what our engineers flag in every review, structured around the problems that actually sink iOS projects in production and in the App Store review queue. Note that Apple is even harder on vibe-coded apps. Therefore, if you want yours to succeed, a professional audit might be the key to having it accepted by the App Store.

Pre-Review Preparation

A productive code review starts before a single line is read. Getting the context right up front means the review itself focuses on real problems rather than setup confusion.

Define the scope and goals:

Identify whether the review covers the full codebase, a specific feature module, a pending App Store submission, or preparation for investor due diligence
Set measurable success criteria: fewer crashes, resolved security issues, improved test coverage, or readiness for a specific iOS version
Clarify the app’s target devices and minimum iOS version, since different versions have different APIs, permission requirements, and behavioral quirks
Identify which extensions are in scope: App Clips, WidgetKit extensions, Live Activities, and Share Extensions each have their own review surface

Verify the environment and tooling:

Confirm that the project builds cleanly in Xcode without warnings or errors on both debug and release configurations
Check that the correct, stable version of Xcode is in use. Apple enforces SDK requirements, and using an outdated version can prevent App Store submissions entirely
Ensure that all team members use the same Swift and dependency versions, as version mismatches introduce subtle bugs that are difficult to trace
Run the project on a physical device, not just the simulator, because certain memory, performance and hardware issues only appear on real hardware

Review dependencies and package management:

Confirm that all third-party packages are managed consistently through Swift Package Manager, CocoaPods, or Carthage, not a mixture of all three without documented justification
Run a dependency audit and verify that no packages carry known security vulnerabilities
Check the last published date and maintenance activity of each dependency. An abandoned library is a future compatibility and security risk
Confirm that dependency lock files (Package.resolved, Podfile.lock) are committed to version control, so all team members build against identical versions
Check that no dependency introduces a transitive package with a restrictive or incompatible license. A GPL-licensed transitive dependency in a commercial App Store app is a legal problem
Verify that Swift Package Manager dependencies are pinned to exact versions or commit hashes in security-sensitive projects, not floating ranges such as .upToNextMajor

Check documentation and project history:

Ensure the README clearly describes how to set up, build, run, and test the project from a clean machine
Review recent commits to understand what changed and why before reviewing the code itself
Verify that any open pull requests are rebased against the latest main branch

Code Organization and Architecture

The structure of an iOS project tells you a great deal about the team that built it. A well-organized project is easier to extend, easier to test, and far cheaper to maintain as requirements change.

Folder structure and module separation:

Verify that the project follows a consistent folder structure: separate directories for models, views, view models or controllers, services, utilities, and resources
Confirm that the app uses a defined architectural pattern consistently throughout the codebase; MVVM, MVC, VIPER, or Clean Architecture are all valid choices, but whichever pattern is selected should be applied uniformly, not abandoned halfway through the project
Ensure that business logic does not reside within UIViewController subclasses. View controllers should handle navigation and user interaction only, delegating data processing and business rules to dedicated service or view model layers

Bad practice:

// ViewController doing too much
class OrderViewController: UIViewController {
    override func viewDidLoad() {
        super.viewDidLoad()
        let request = NSFetchRequest<Order>(entityName: "Order")        
        request.predicate = NSPredicate(format: "status == %0", "pending")
        let orders = CoreDataStack.shared.context.fetch(request)
        let total = orders.reduce(0) { $0 + $1.price * $1.quantity * taxRate }
        sendConfirmationEmail(to: currentUser.email, total: total)
    }
}

Good practice:

// ViewController delegates to a service
class OrderViewController: UIViewController {
    private let orderService: OrderService

    override func viewDidLoad() {
        super.viewDidLoad()
        Task {
            let summary = await orderService.fetchPendingSummary()
            updateUI(with: summary)
        }
    }
}

Naming conventions:

Use camelCase for variables, functions, properties, and global constants declared with let; PascalCase for types, protocols, and enumerations
UPPER_SNAKE_CASE is an Objective-C and C convention and is not idiomatic Swift – avoid it in new Swift code
Ensure file names match the type they contain: a file named UserProfileViewModel.swift should contain the UserProfileViewModel type and nothing else
Avoid single-letter variable names outside of very short closures. For example, user is always clearer than u, and completion is always clearer than c

Protocol and extension usage:

Verify that protocols are used to define shared behavior rather than subclassing chains. Deep class hierarchies in iOS code are harder to test and harder to change
Check that extensions are used to organize functionality into logical groups rather than creating files that are thousands of lines long
Confirm that extension files are named descriptively, such as String+Validation.swift or UIColor+BrandColors.swift, so their purpose is immediately clear

Swift Language and Code Quality

Swift gives you a lot of tools to write safe, expressive code. A code review is the place to confirm that those tools are being used well, not worked around.

Optionals and forced unwrapping:

Review every occurrence of the force-unwrap operator (!) and confirm each one is justified; force-unwrapping a nil value crashes the app immediately, and most uses can be replaced with safer alternatives
Check that guard let and if let are used to unwrap optionals safely, and that the failure paths actually handle the absent value rather than just returning silently

Bad practice:

let user = userRepository.findUser(by: id)!  // crashes if not found
let name = user.profile!.displayName!        // crashes on nil profile or name

Good practice:

guard let user = userRepository.findUser(by: id) else {
    logger.warning("User not found for id: (id)")
    showErrorState()
    return
}
let name = user.profile?.displayName ?? "Anonymous"

Error handling:

Verify that functions that can fail use Swift’s throws mechanism rather than returning nil or relying on optionals to signal errors. Callers deserve to know what went wrong
Check that all try calls inside do-catch blocks have specific catch clauses for known error types, as a single catch-all block that ignores errors is not error handling but rather ‘error hiding’
Confirm that errors are logged with enough context for a developer to understand what happened, what input triggered it, and where in the codebase the failure occurred

Value types versus reference types:

Review the use of struct versus class; structs are copied, which makes them safer in concurrent code and easier to reason about; use classes when you explicitly need reference semantics or need to subclass
Check that structs conform to Equatable and Hashable where those conformances are useful, such as when the type is stored in sets or used as dictionary keys
Verify that large structs are not being passed through performance-sensitive code paths where copying would be expensive; profile first, optimize second

Concurrency:

Confirm that the codebase uses Swift’s modern concurrency model (async/await, actor, Task) rather than a mix of DispatchQueue, OperationQueue, and completion handlers that produce unpredictable side effects
Check that all UI updates happen on the main thread; updating a UILabel or calling tableView.reloadData() from a background thread produces crashes that are intermittent and notoriously hard to reproduce

Bad practice:

URLSession.shared.dataTask(with: url) { data, _, _ in
    self.titleLabel.text = parseTitle(from: data) // UI update on background thread
}.resume()

Good practice:

Task {
    let title = try await fetchTitle(from: url) // runs off main thread
    await MainActor.run {
        self.titleLabel.text = title            // UI update on main thread
    }
}

Review uses of @MainActor to ensure that view models and UI-related code are correctly isolated to the main thread

Swift 6 concurrency readiness:

Swift 6 introduces strict data race checking. Projects should be audited for readiness now, even if migration is phased.

Check the project’s SWIFT_STRICT_CONCURRENCY build setting. A value of complete enables Swift 6-level data race checking and is the target state for all new code. Projects still on minimal or targeted should have a documented migration plan
Review all types passed across concurrency boundaries for Sendable conformance. The compiler flags non-Sendable types in strict mode, but in lenient mode these are silent data races that surface under load
Audit uses of Task.detached. Unlike structured Task { }, detached tasks do not inherit the caller’s actor context or task-local values. Every Task.detached call should have a comment explaining why it is intentionally unstructured

Deprecation audit:

Deprecation warnings compound over time and block future SDK adoption. Therefore, it’s imperative to address these issues before they impair your app development progress.

Run a build with -warn-deprecated-declarations and resolve all warnings before submission
Check for usage of UIWebView (fully banned from the App Store since 2023), OpenGL ES (deprecated), and Objective-C bridging patterns that have modern Swift equivalents
Verify that the minimum deployment target is set intentionally and not left at an old iOS version that forces use of deprecated APIs

Memory Management

Memory management issues are the leading cause of production crashes in iOS apps. Swift uses Automatic Reference Counting (ARC) to manage memory, but ARC still requires developers to make deliberate choices about how objects reference each other.

Retain cycles:

Search for closures that strongly capture self. This is one of the most common sources of memory leaks in iOS apps, particularly in network callbacks, timers, and animation blocks

Bad practice:

// Strong capture of self creates a retain cycle
networkClient.fetchData { response in
    self.processResponse(response)  // self retains networkClient, networkClient retains self
}

Good practice:

networkClient.fetchData { [weak self] response in
    guard let self else { return }
    self.processResponse(response)
}

Check that delegate properties are declared as weak, as a strong delegate reference is almost always a retain cycle waiting to happen
Review uses of unowned to confirm that the referenced object will always outlive the referencing object. If there is any doubt, use weak instead, since a dangling unowned reference crashes the app

Memory leak detection:

Confirm that the team uses Xcode’s Memory Graph Debugger and the Instruments Leaks tool as part of the development and review process
Verify that deinit methods are implemented in key classes and that they execute as expected; a class whose deinit is never called is a class that is leaking
Check that NotificationCenter observers are removed when a view controller or object is deallocated, as unreleased observers keep the object alive and fire on deallocated targets

Resource management:

Review image and asset loading to confirm that large images are not kept in memory longer than needed. Use UIImage(named:) for frequently reused images and UIImage(contentsOfFile:) for large images that should not be cached
Verify that data loaded from the network or disk is not retained indefinitely in memory when it could be stored in a disk cache or fetched on demand

Networking and Data Handling

Networking code is where many iOS apps accumulate technical debt. Poorly structured network layers become expensive to maintain as the API surface grows.

Network layer organization:

Confirm that all network requests are centralized in a dedicated network layer rather than scattered across view controllers and view models
Verify that API endpoints, base URLs, and authentication tokens are not hardcoded in individual files, because these should be managed through environment configuration
Check that network requests use URLSession or a well-maintained library such as Alamofire with a consistent error handling strategy

Response parsing and validation:

Review the use of Codable for JSON parsing, as models should decode gracefully and handle missing or unexpected fields without crashing
Confirm that server responses are validated before use, and never assume a field marked optional in the API documentation is actually optional in practice
Check that pagination, timeout handling, and retry logic are implemented for any request that could face unreliable network conditions

SwiftData and Core Data:

At the moment, the recommended persistence layer for apps targeting iOS 17 and later is SwiftData. However, Core Data remains fully supported for the apps that are using it. Therefore, you have the freedom to choose the option that fits your case best, so long as you do it safely.

If the app targets iOS 17 or later, review whether SwiftData is used or planned. SwiftData’s @Model macro replaces NSManagedObject and integrates with Swift concurrency natively
For projects on Core Data, confirm that fetch requests use NSFetchRequest with parameterized NSPredicate format strings – never string interpolation – to prevent predicate injection
Verify that Core Data managed object contexts are used on the correct thread. NSManagedObjectContext is not thread-safe; use performAndWait or background contexts for off-main-thread work
Check that SwiftData or Core Data migration strategies are documented and tested before each release that changes the model

Sensitive data in transit:

Confirm that App Transport Security (ATS) is enabled and that no exceptions have been added to Info.plist without a documented reason. ATS exceptions allow plain HTTP connections and are a direct path to data interception
For high-security applications such as banking or health apps, consider implementing SSL pinning to ensure the app only communicates with trusted servers even if a certificate authority is compromised. Prefer public key pinning (SPKI) over full certificate pinning, as pinning the full certificate breaks whenever the server rotates its cert and requires an emergency app update. For most apps, ATS combined with modern TLS provides sufficient protection without the operational risk

Security Best Practices

iOS has strong built-in security capabilities, which is a definite advantage. However, they help only if you implement them correctly. Apple’s guidelines place privacy and security at the top of their review criteria. You can see proof of this in the App Store’s 2024 transparency report, which confirms that privacy violations remained among the leading causes of rejection and removal.

Keychain and secure storage:

Confirm that sensitive data such as authentication tokens, passwords, and cryptographic keys are stored in the iOS Keychain, not in UserDefaults, plain files, or NSUserDefaults. Keychain items are encrypted and tied to the app’s identity
Verify that Keychain items use appropriate accessibility settings: kSecAttrAccessibleWhenUnlockedThisDeviceOnly is appropriate for most sensitive data and prevents iCloud backup and migration to new devices
Review any use of the Secure Enclave for cryptographic operations on devices that support it. Secure Enclave performs cryptographic work in hardware without ever exposing the key to app memory

Data protection:

Confirm that files containing sensitive data are created with the NSFileProtectionComplete data protection class, which encrypts them when the device is locked
Verify that sensitive data is cleared from memory as soon as it is no longer needed; after using a password or token, overwrite the variable and set it to nil rather than leaving it in memory until the next garbage collection

Input validation and injection prevention:

Review all points where user-supplied input reaches a database query, file path, or URL construction, as these are potential injection points and must be validated and sanitized before use
Confirm that web views do not execute JavaScript from untrusted sources. If a WKWebView loads external content, disable JavaScript unless it is required

Authentication and session management:

Verify that the app uses Sign in with Apple or a secure OAuth 2.0 flow rather than rolling a custom authentication implementation
Check that session tokens are refreshed appropriately, and that expired tokens are cleared from storage. A token that was valid six months ago should not still be granting access today
Confirm that biometric authentication (Face ID, Touch ID) is used through LocalAuthentication with a fallback to device passcode, not as a substitute for server-side authentication

Performance Optimization

iOS users expect their apps to respond in an instant. Therefore, a slow app is a deleted app. The good news for you is that most performance problems arise from specific, identifiable patterns that a code review can catch before they reach users.

Main thread performance:

Identify any file I/O, database reads, network calls, or heavy computation running on the main thread. All of these should be moved to background threads, and the results dispatched back to the main thread for UI updates
Check that viewDidLoad and viewWillAppear do not contain expensive synchronous work. These methods run on the main thread, and any delay directly stalls the UI

Table and collection view optimization:

Verify that UITableView and UICollectionView cell reuse is implemented correctly and that cells do not retain state from previous items after being dequeued
Check that images displayed in cells are loaded asynchronously, and that a placeholder is shown while the image fetches, because synchronous image loading in a scroll view causes visible stutter
Confirm that cell heights are calculated efficiently; calling systemLayoutSizeFitting on every cell in tableView(_:heightForRowAt:) is a common cause of scroll jitter

Launch time and startup performance:

Review the app’s startup sequence and confirm that only essential work happens before the first screen appears. Deferred loading and lazy initialization should be used for anything not required at launch
Check that large assets and resources are not loaded synchronously during app launch, and use background queues and display a loading state if necessary
Verify that the app has been profiled with Xcode’s Time Profiler instrument, as identifying the actual bottlenecks is always more productive than guessing

Battery and resource efficiency:

Review background task usage and confirm that background modes declared in the app’s entitlements are actually needed. Unnecessary background modes drain battery and invite closer App Store review scrutiny
Check that location updates use the lowest accuracy level that the feature requires; requesting kCLLocationAccuracyBest for a feature that only needs the user’s city is a significant battery drain

Xcode Instruments

Time Profiler – identify CPU hotspots on the main thread. Look for any work exceeding 16ms that would block a frame
Allocations – track heap growth over a typical user session. A chart that never flattens during normal use signals a leak or an unbounded cache
Leaks – automated retain cycle detection. Run after every major feature, not just before submission
Memory Graph Debugger – built into Xcode, shows the live object graph. The fastest way to prove a retain cycle exists and trace exactly which reference is holding it
Hangs – detects main thread hangs above a threshold. Apple uses this same data for the Hang Rate metric visible in Xcode Organizer
Energy Log / CPU Usage – measure battery impact of background work, location updates, and Bluetooth. Apps that drain battery get deleted and reviewed poorly
Network instrument – simulate poor connections (Edge, 3G, packet loss) to catch timeout handling gaps that only appear in the real world
Core Data template – inspect fetch request performance, fault firing patterns, and persistent store I/O for apps using Core Data
SwiftUI instrument – body re-render count per view. An invisible performance killer in SwiftUI apps where view identity is misconfigured

App size and binary analysis

Review the app’s uncompressed binary size and confirm it stays under Apple’s cellular download warning threshold (currently 200 MB)
Use Xcode’s App Size Report, generated during archive, to identify which frameworks, assets, and resources contribute most to binary size
Check that unused assets are not bundled
Verify that large media assets use On-Demand Resources if they are not needed at first launch

Build Configuration and Code Signing

Build configuration problems are a frequent source of production bugs and rejections from the. App Store. They are rarely covered in code reviews but are consistently painful when missed.

Debug vs Release build configurations

Confirm that Debug and Release build configurations differ meaningfully: assertions enabled in Debug, stripped in Release; debug logging disabled in Release
Check that the DEBUG flag is used consistently and that no debug-only code paths – test accounts, logging endpoints, feature flags – can reach a production binary
Verify that compiler optimizations are set correctly: None [-O0] for Debug (faster builds, better debugger) and Optimize for Speed [-O] or Optimize for Size [-Oz] for Release
Check that dead code stripping is enabled for Release builds to reduce binary size and remove unreachable code paths

Code signing and provisioning

Confirm that provisioning profiles are managed through automatic signing in Xcode or a tool like Fastlane Match, not manually downloaded profiles that expire without warning and break CI pipelines
Verify that entitlements in the .entitlements file match exactly what is enabled in the App Store Connect capability configuration. Mismatches cause archive failures or silent capability breakage at runtime
Check that push notification certificates or authentication keys are rotated before expiry and that the team has a documented renewal process

Testing and Code Coverage

Tests are the written contract between your code and the behavior it promises. Therefore, comprehensive testing is a mandatory step if you want your app to be approved for the App Store and have a chance to attract users. In addition, without recurrent testing, every change carries hidden risks.

Unit and integration tests:

Verify that all business logic, data transformation functions, and service classes have unit tests covering the happy path, edge cases, and failure conditions
Confirm that tests use dependency injection or protocol-based abstractions so that real network calls, databases, and hardware are replaced with test doubles
Check that integration tests cover critical user flows from end to end, particularly authentication, payment handling, and data persistence

UI testing:

Confirm that critical user flows have UI tests that run against real or simulated device states, not just unit-level assertions
Verify that UI tests use stable, unique accessibility identifiers rather than positional queries like ‘the third button in the second section’, which break whenever the layout changes

Test quality:

Review test names to confirm they describe the expected behavior, for example, test_login_withExpiredToken_shouldRedirectToLoginScreen() rather than testLogin()
Confirm that no tests are permanently disabled with .skip or XCTSkip without a documented and tracked reason for the exclusion
Verify that the CI pipeline runs the full test suite on every pull request and blocks merges on test failures

Crash Reporting and Observability

Tests tell you what the code does in a controlled environment. However, you need crash reporting and observability to tell you what it does in the real world, on real devices, under real conditions.

Crash reporting:

Confirm that a crash reporting SDK is integrated (Firebase Crashlytics, Sentry, or similar) and that dSYM files are uploaded automatically for every release build so crashes are symbolicated and readable
Verify that the crash reporting SDK itself does not introduce privacy manifest violations. Several popular SDKs added required reason APIs in recent versions that must be declared in PrivacyInfo.xcprivacy
Check that non-fatal errors and unexpected states are logged as non-fatal events, not just crashes. A silent failure is harder to debug than a crash

Xcode Organizer and App Store Connect metrics:

Review the app’s Crash reports in Xcode Organizer before any review of a live app. These aggregate symbolicated crash logs from real users and are the fastest way to identify top issues in production
Check the app’s Hang Rate and Scroll Hitch Rate in Organizer. Apple flags apps in the worst 25% of their category, and these metrics feed directly into App Store visibility
Review Disk Writes diagnostics. Excessive disk I/O is a common problem in Core Data apps that save on every keystroke
Check the Battery Usage percentile relative to peer apps. This is the baseline for any energy audit and is available without running Instruments

App Store Compliance and Privacy

Apple reviewed 7.77 million submissions in 2024, and nearly two million of them were rejected. The teams that pass on the first submission treat the App Store guidelines as engineering requirements, not afterthoughts.

Privacy manifest and data declarations:

Confirm that a Privacy Manifest file (PrivacyInfo.xcprivacy) exists and accurately declares all APIs used, data collected, and the reasons for their use. Apple enforces this for all third-party SDKs bundled in the app, as well as the app itself
Verify that the App Store Connect privacy nutrition label accurately reflects the app’s actual data collection behavior, as inconsistencies between declared and actual behavior are a leading cause of removal
Review all calls to privacy-sensitive APIs: location, camera, microphone, contacts, photos, health, and tracking. Each one must have a clear, user-facing purpose string in Info.plist that explains in plain language why the permission is needed

Permission request timing:

Review the timing of all permission request calls. Each permission should be requested at the moment the user takes an action that requires it, not at launch
Show a brief in-app explanation immediately before the system prompt so the user understands why the permission is needed before the system dialog appears
A usage description string in Info.plist is required, but it is not a substitute for good request timing

In-App Purchases and entitlements:

Confirm that any digital content or features unlocked within the app use Apple’s In-App Purchase system. Bypassing this with external payment links is a guideline violation that leads to rejection and potential removal
Verify that a ‘Restore Purchases’ button is accessible to users and that it works reliably, as Apple reviewers test this explicitly
Check that entitlements declared in the app match those enabled in the App Store Connect configuration, because mismatches cause signing failures

Account deletion:

Confirm that any app offering account creation also provides a way to delete that account directly within the app. This has been a hard requirement since June 2023 and is checked during every review

Accessibility and Localization

An app used by most people is built with accessibility and localization in mind from the beginning, not added as a last step before shipping.

Accessibility:

Verify that all interactive elements have meaningful accessibility labels. A button with an icon and no label is invisible to VoiceOver users
Check that the app respects the system’s Dynamic Type setting and that text scales appropriately without breaking layouts
Confirm that color is never the sole means of conveying information. Users with color blindness should be able to understand all states and messages through labels or iconography as well
Verify that minimum touch target sizes meet Apple’s Human Interface Guidelines recommendation of at least 44 by 44 points

Localization:

Confirm that all user-facing strings are wrapped in NSLocalizedString and that none are hardcoded directly in the source files
Review the Localizable.strings file for completeness; missing translations fall back silently to the development language and can produce confusing mixed-language screens
Check that date, time, currency, and number formatting use locale-aware formatters rather than fixed format strings. A date formatted as ‘MM/DD/YYYY’ means something different in Europe than it does in the US

Right-to-left and pseudolocalization

Verify that the app handles right-to-left layouts correctly for markets using Arabic, Hebrew, or Persian. Use NSTextAlignment.natural and leading/trailing Auto Layout constraints instead of left/right
Check that string formatting uses String(format:locale:) rather than String(format:) alone when the output is user-facing
Confirm that the app has been tested with pseudolocalization to catch truncated labels and hardcoded layout assumptions before real translations are delivered. Xcode supports this natively under scheme settings

Why Trust iOS Code Review with Redwerk

Most iOS quality problems are not mysteriousissues that appear from nowhere. They are the same patterns that show up in different codebases:

Retain cycles nobody profiled
Keychain secrets replaced with UserDefaults
UI updates firing off the main thread
App Store submissions sent without checking the privacy manifest

We’ve tried to cover them all in this checklist. However, going through it will only get you so far. The real question is whether your team has the bandwidth and distance to run through it honestly before the stakes get high.

You can see an example of why this matters from our own practice. Check out Gooroo, an iOS tutoring platform we built from scratch in Swift. The app connected tutors and students across New York and became an official vendor partner to the NYC Department of Education. It also earned a 5-star ranking in the App Store and ranked number three on Product Hunt.

However, to get to that level of recognition we had to ensure the code was right at every layer:

Clean MVVM architecture
Memory management that held up under real user loa
Privacy handling that satisfied App Store reviewers on the first submission
Test suite that let the team iterate quickly without regressions

You can’t achieve that kind of outcome without complete dedication and attention to detail. It comes from treating code quality as a feature, not a task to defer until after launch.

Our team has been shipping and auditing iOS applications for over 20 years. We cover architecture, memory analysis, security hardening, App Store compliance, and test coverage. You get a report that is specific, prioritized, and written for decision-makers as well as developers. We never provide vague observations or generic recommendations.

If you want a clear picture of where your iOS codebase actually stands, our code review service is the place to start. Let’s talk about what you have built, and we will tell you exactly what we find.